Blank Da 1059 PDF Template

When it comes to managing and understanding service-related documentation in the military, the DA Form 1059, or Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is a vital piece of paperwork for evaluating the performance and potential of service members in an academic setting. Here are some frequently asked questions about the DA 1059 form:

1. What is the purpose of the DA Form 1059?

   The DA Form 1059 is used to document and evaluate a service member's performance during a course of instruction. This evaluation covers a range of areas, including written and oral communication skills, leadership skills, contributions to group work, and the individual's research ability. It is a comprehensive assessment tool that helps in determining a service member's academic potential and suitability for further training or higher-level schooling.

2. Who fills out the DA Form 1059?

   The instructor or rater of the course fills out the majority of the form, assessing the service member's performance across various areas. The form also requires inputs from a reviewing officer, who oversees the evaluation to ensure its accuracy and fairness. Finally, the service member being evaluated signs the form, acknowledging the evaluation, and has the opportunity to make comments if the report is referred.

3. What happens if a service member receives a "NON-SAT" rating in any area?

   If a service member receives a "not satisfactory" (NON-SAT) rating in any of the evaluated areas, this must be supported with specific comments by the rater in the comments section (Item 14). A NON-SAT rating can impact the service member's opportunities for future schooling or advanced training, highlighting the importance of detailed and constructive feedback to support any negative evaluation.

4. Can a service member comment on their DA Form 1059?

   Yes, if the evaluation is referred (as indicated in Item 9), the service member has the right to make comments. This option gives service members the chance to provide their perspective or address any issues they believe affected their performance during the course. Allowing comments ensures transparency and fairness in the evaluation process.

5. How does the DA Form 1059 affect a service member's career?

   The DA Form 1059 plays a significant role in a service member's career, particularly when being considered for further education, promotions, or specialized assignments. It provides a documented record of the individual's academic abilities and performance, which can be crucial for career development and progression within the military. A positive evaluation can open up opportunities, whereas a negative one may require the individual to seek improvement or additional training.

6. What is the significance of the authentication section (Item 15)?

   The authentication section ensures that all parties involved in the evaluation—the rater, the reviewing officer, and the rated service member—have reviewed and acknowledged the report's content. This section is critical for maintaining the integrity of the evaluation process, as it confirms that the report was conducted in accordance with the established guidelines and that everyone involved agrees with the information as recorded.

Understanding the DA Form 1059 is essential for service members undergoing evaluation and for those responsible for conducting and reviewing such assessments. It is a key document in shaping the professional journeys of individuals within the military by documenting their academic prowess and potential for career advancement.

When filling out the DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report, individuals often make several common mistakes. Avoiding these errors is crucial for an accurate and comprehensive evaluation. Below, we outline the most frequent mistakes observed:

1. Not verifying the accuracy of personal information, including last name, first name, and middle initial. This critical step ensures the report accurately reflects the individual's identity.

2. Entering an incorrect Social Security Number (SSN). Since the SSN is a unique identifier, any mistake can lead to significant issues in record keeping and identity verification.

3. Providing inaccurate grade, branch (BR), or specialty/MOSC. This information impacts the context of the evaluation and future career opportunities.

4. Misstating the course title or name of the school. Accuracy in these fields is essential for the relevance and applicability of the academic evaluation.

5. Failing to accurately reflect the duration of the course in the format YYYYMMDD, from the start through the end. This mistake can lead to a misunderstanding of the course's scope and intensity.

6. Omitting a decision on whether they wish to make comments in case of a referred report. This section provides an opportunity to clarify or contest aspects of the evaluation.

7. Incomplete or incorrect evaluation in the performance summary and demonstrated abilities sections, including written and oral communication, leadership skills, and contribution to group work. Each area must be carefully considered to provide a comprehensive view of performance.

8. Omitting comments to support ratings of "superior" or "unacceptable," especially since the instructions explicitly require this. Comments provide context and justification for the ratings given.

9. Incorrectly handling the signature section, including missing signatures from the rater, reviewing officer, and the rated soldier. This omission can question the report's validity.

In conclusion, paying careful attention to detail and thoroughly reviewing each section before submission can prevent these mistakes. This careful approach ensures that the evaluation serves its intended purpose effectively and supports the individual's career development accurately.

The DA Form 1059, titled Service School Academic Evaluation Report, is part of a comprehensive documentation process within the military education and career management system. This form is vital for recording a soldier's performance and potential during specific training courses. Along with the DA Form 1059, various other forms and documents are often utilized to provide a complete view of a soldier's qualifications, achievements, and overall suitability for further responsibilities or advanced training. Here is a list of such documents:

1. DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award): This form is used to recommend military personnel for awards and decorations. It outlines the achievements or meritorious service that justifies the recommendation.
2. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): This document is issued upon a military service member's retirement, separation, or discharge from active duty. It includes details such as service dates, rank, and awards received.
3. DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard): This scorecard records the physical fitness test results, an essential aspect of a soldier’s profile that might accompany academic evaluations for a holistic view of their capabilities.
4. DA Form 5500 (Body Fat Content Worksheet): If applicable, this form complements the DA Form 705 by providing detailed calculations of a soldier's body fat content, ensuring they meet physical standards in conjunction with academic evaluations.
5. DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action): This form is used for various personnel actions, including training requests which could relate to the courses evaluated on the DA Form 1059.
6. DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile): This document provides a detailed account of a soldier's physical capabilities and limitations, which may influence their suitability for certain courses or assignments.
7. DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms): Used for suggesting improvements to forms and publications, this form might be relevant if feedback from the DA Form 1059 indicates a need for changes in training documentation.
8. DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave): This request form for official leave might be used in conjunction with the DA Form 1059 if a soldier is participating in training courses that require absence from regular duty.
9. DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Form): This counseling form is often used to document discussions about a soldier's career development and can complement the DA Form 1059 by providing a context for performance evaluations.
10. DA Form 4187-1-R (Personnel Action Form - Reserve Component): For reserve component members, this form is used similarly to the DA Form 4187, for requests pertaining to training, reassignments, and other personnel actions that relate to academic evaluations.

Each of these documents plays a distinct role in the lifecycle of military personnel management and development. When used alongside the DA Form 1059, they provide a comprehensive view of a soldier's career, including their academic performance, physical fitness, and overall readiness for advancement. It is vital for personnel to ensure that these forms are accurately completed and updated to reflect their latest achievements and qualifications accurately.

• DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): Similar to the DA Form 1059, the DD Form 214 is a document used by the Department of Defense to summarize a military member's service history and status upon discharge. Both forms provide key personal and service details, though for different contexts—training performance versus overall service discharge.

• OPM Form 71 (Request for Leave or Approved Absence): Like the DA Form 1059, the OPM Form 71 is used within federal service, but focuses on requesting leave or absences. Both documents require personal identification details and are processed by administrative departments, but serve distinct functions within personnel management.

• DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award): This form parallels the DA Form 1059 by being used within the Army to record assessments—specifically, recommendations for awards based on performance and achievement. Both forms capture assessments of an individual's capabilities and contributions, albeit for different recognition purposes.

• NAVCOMPT Form 3065 (Leave Request/Authorization): Similar to the DA Form 1059's use in the Army for academic evaluation, the NAVCOMPT Form 3065 is used by Navy personnel to request and authorize leave. While each serves distinct areas—academic evaluation versus leave management—both require detailed personal information and official approvals.

• DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile): This form is akin to the DA Form 1059 in that it provides a formal assessment of an individual’s physical capabilities within the Army. While the DA Form 3349 focuses on physical fitness and limitations, the DA Form 1059 assesses academic and leadership skills, showcasing how different forms evaluate varied aspects of a service member's abilities.

• AF Form 707 (Officer Performance Report): The Air Force's Officer Performance Report (AF Form 707) parallels the DA Form 1059 by documenting performance evaluations, but specifically for officers. Both forms assess professional capabilities, though they cater to different branches and rank categories within the U.S. military.

• CG-5310A (Coast Guard Enlisted Employee Review): This document bears similarity to the DA Form 1059 in its function of evaluating Coast Guard enlisted personnel's performance. While focused on different service branches, both serve the critical function of documenting and assessing service members' performance, abilities, and potential for further advancement.

• DA Form 2166-9 Series (NCO Evaluation Report): Used for evaluating non-commissioned officers in the Army, this series of forms functions similarly to the DA Form 1059’s purpose of documenting training and performance. Both play integral roles in career development and leadership assessment within the military context.

• NOAA Form 56-6 (Officer Evaluation Report): Designed for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Corps, this form captures performance evaluations similar to the DA Form 1059. Each is tailored to its specific branch’s needs but shares the goal of assessing and documenting individual performance and potential.

• VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim): While primarily used within the Veterans Affairs system for claims support, this form shares with the DA Form 1059 the requirement for detailed personal information and official processing. Both forms play crucial roles in the administrative processes of their respective departments, though for significantly different purposes.

Filling out the DA 1059 form, a Service School Academic Evaluation Report, requires attention to detail and a thorough understanding of its sections. Here are some dos and don'ts to keep in mind:

• Do ensure that all personal information such as last name, first name, middle initial, SSN, grade, and branch is filled out accurately. Inaccurate information can lead to processing delays or misfiled evaluations.
• Do accurately specify the Course Title, Name of School, and the duration of the course using the YYYYMMDD format for both the start and end dates.
• Do provide detailed comments in item 14 to support any ratings of Superior or Unsatisfactory in the Performance Summary and Demonstrated Abilities sections. Detailed comments help in providing context for the ratings.
• Do answer whether the student demonstrated the potential for higher-level schooling/training accurately in section 13 and support your answer with comments in item 14 if you select 'No'.
• Do ensure that the typed names, grades, branches, and titles of the rater and reviewing officer are correctly filled out, and that all signatures and dates are provided to authenticate the evaluation.

• Don't leave any fields blank unless they are specifically marked as optional or not applicable to your evaluation. Incomplete forms can lead to callbacks and delays.
• Don't exceed the comment limits where specified, such as the 20% limit for class enrollment mentioned in the form. Stick to concise, meaningful feedback that fits within the provided spaces.
• Don't ignore the instruction to justify certain ratings with comments. For example, if you rate a skill as Superior or Unsatisfactory, supporting comments are not just encouraged but required.
• Don't forget to check everything over before submitting. Mistakes or omissions can reflect poorly on both the student and the rater.

Following these guidelines will help ensure that the evaluation is fair, properly documented, and useful for future training and development decisions regarding the service member being evaluated.

There are several misconceptions about the DA Form 1059, also known as the Service School Academic Evaluation Report. Understanding these misconceptions is crucial for both evaluators and service members to ensure the form is used correctly and effectively.

• Misconception 1: The DA Form 1059 is only used for negative reporting.

  This is incorrect. The form is designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of a service member's performance and potential, covering both strengths and areas for improvement.

• Misconception 2: Comments are only needed for unsatisfactory ratings.

  Every superior or unsatisfactory rating requires comments to provide context and justification for the evaluation, not just the unsatisfactory ones.

• Misconception 3: The form is solely for Army personnel.

  While the DA Form 1059 is primarily used within the Army, its structure and purpose can serve as a model for evaluation across different branches, subject to their specific regulations and forms.

• Misconception 4: Academic potential is only about completing the course.

  The section asking if the student has demonstrated the academic potential for higher level schooling/training is not solely about passing the course. It considers the service member’s capability and readiness for more advanced responsibilities.

• Misconception 5: The form does not accommodate feedback from the rated soldier.

  Soldiers are given the opportunity to make comments on the referral report, enabling them to provide their perspective or address areas of concern.

• Misconception 6: Duration of the course is irrelevant.

  The duration of the course (listed in YYMMDD format from start to finish) is critical for providing context about the training period and intensity, impacting the overall evaluation.

• Misconception 7: Specialty/Military Occupational Specialty Code (MOSC) is not a critical component.

  This information is vital as it helps in assessing the relevance and performance of the service member in relation to their specialty or MOSC, guiding future assignments and training needs.

• Misconception 8: The form is only about academic performance.

  While academic performance is a significant focus, the DA Form 1059 also evaluates leadership skills, oral and written communication, contribution to group work, and research abilities, providing a holistic view of the service member’s capabilities.

Here are nine key takeaways about filling out and using the DA 1059 form, also known as the Service School Academic Evaluation Report:

• Before you start, ensure you have the most recent version of the form. The DA 1059 form was revised in March 2006, making any previous editions obsolete.
• The form is used to evaluate a service member's performance in a military schooling or training course, covering a range of areas including leadership skills and communication abilities.
• Clearly fill out the basic information such as the service member's name, Social Security Number (SSN), grade, branch, and the specific course title at the beginning of the form.
• Take note that the course start and end dates should be recorded in the YYYYMMDD format, as mentioned in the section on the duration of the course.
• When documenting performance summary and demonstrated abilities, the form provides specific criteria such as written and oral communication, leadership skills, and group work contribution. These must be clearly marked as superior, satisfactory, unsatisfactory, or not evaluated.
• Superior and unsatisfactory ratings require supporting comments, so be prepared to provide detailed feedback in item 14 for any such evaluations.
• Item 13 inquires whether the rated soldier has shown academic potential for higher level schooling or training. A "no" response must also be supported by comments explaining the decision.
• The form allows for comments in item 14. Use this space to provide additional insights or explanations about the service member's performance and potential. This section is critical for a comprehensive evaluation.
• The form must be authenticated by the rater, reviewing officer, and the rated soldier, each providing a typed name, grade, branch, title, and signature along with the date in the YYYYMMDD format.

Accurately completing the DA 1059 form is essential for a fair and effective assessment of service members' performance in their respective training courses, contributing to their professional development and future opportunities.