Navigation
In the legal landscape, the journey to upholding confidentiality and loyalty within the attorney-client relationship presents a labyrinth of complexities, a narrative vividly encapsulated in the Points and Authorities form concerning Orenthal James Simpson's ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and a Preliminary Injunction against Lawrence Schiller, Robert Kardashian, Project 95 Productions, Inc., and others. The heart of this legal maneuver pivots on the sacred promise of confidentiality and loyalty owed by attorneys to their clients, a principle unwavering in its application regardless of the client’s societal stature. This foundational legal premise, designed to protect confidential client communications, faces its crucible when fame and profit tempt individuals to breach these oaths, as alleged against Kardashian and Schiller. The duo is accused of clandestinely gathering and disseminating privileged information, with Schiller further aiming to adapt this contention into a television miniseries, thereby magnifying the potential breach of confidentiality. This form not only highlights the vigorous efforts to safeguard Simpson’s rights through legal injunctions but also encapsulates a broader legal discourse on the enforcement of confidentiality agreements, the ethical obligations binding attorneys, and the permissible bounds of First Amendment rights in relation to privileged information. Amidst the unveiling of these legal skirmishes is also a lamentation over the fragility of trust within the realm of legal defense, underscored by the alleged complicity of Kardashian, a defense attorney turned betrayer through his reported exploitation of privileged communications for literary gain. This document, emergent from the tumultuous waters of a high-profile legal battle, yet again underscores the relentless pursuit of justice and the unwavering endeavor to uphold the sanctity of attorney-client confidentiality against the erosive forces of opportunism and exploitation.
Preview - Points And Authorities Form
1Terry Gross (103878) Adam C. Belsky (147800)
2GROSS & BELSKY LLP
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 1040
3San Francisco, California 94111
|
Telephone: (415) |
|
|
|
||
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorneys for Plaintiff |
|
|
|
||
5 |
ORENTHAL JAMES SIMPSON |
|
|
|
||
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
|||
9 |
|
|
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES |
|||
10 |
|
|
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION |
|||
11 |
ORENTHAL JAMES SIMPSON, |
) Case No. __________ |
||||
|
|
|
|
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Plaintiff, |
) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND |
||
|
|
|
|
) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF |
||
13 |
|
|
|
) PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION |
||
|
|
|
v. |
) |
FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING |
|
14 |
|
|
|
) ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE |
||
|
|
|
|
) |
RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION |
|
15 |
LAWRENCE SCHILLER, ROBERT |
) |
|
|
||
|
KARDASHIAN, PROJECT 95 |
) |
|
|
||
16 |
PRODUCTIONS, INC., and DOES |
) |
Date: |
August 15, 2000 |
||
|
|
|
|
) |
Time: |
8:30 a.m. |
17 |
|
|
Defendants. |
) |
Dept.: 85/86 |
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1 |
INTRODUCTION |
2It is a bedrock principle of American jurisprudence that clients may speak to their attorneys in
3complete confidence, and that the work of their attorneys shall similarly be protected from disclosure.
4This principle obviously applies equally for all criminal defendants, popular or unpopular, rich or poor,
5famous or obscure. There is no media exception to an attorney’s ethical duties of loyalty and
6confidentiality to his client. It is also a basic principle of American law to enforce agreements
7prohibiting the disclosure of confidential information. Here, however, the temptation of fame and
8fortune blinded one of O.J. Simpson’s attorneys, Robert Kardashian, and an author, Lawrence Schiller,
9who saw the opportunityofa bestseller beckoning. They conspired to insinuate Schiller into Simpson’s
10confidence and for Kardashian to make surreptitious tape recordings and notes about confidentialclient
11information, which he disclosed to Schiller. Both made fraudulent representations that they were co-
12authoring a book and that they would submit any manuscript to Simpson to ensure that it contained no
13privileged or confidential information. Both breached their fiduciary duties and confidentiality
14agreements, first by writing a book, and now for Schiller to direct and produce a television miniseries,
15just in production, based almost entirely on improperly obtained information purported to be attorney-
16client privileged communications or confidential defense team discussions.
17A TRO and preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from any further actions to participate
18in or transfer rights associated with the miniseries is essential to preserve Simpson’s rights, as the wide
19dissemination of information concerning confidential client conversations and discussions cannot be
20undone. There is no First Amendment prohibition against an injunction to prevent disclosure of
21information obtained in violation of confidentiality agreements or in breach of fiduciary duties. That
22Schiller previously published a book containing information in the miniseries is not a defense to an
23injunction, since the miniseries screenplay contains additional, undisclosed information. Also, courts
24can enjoin a wrongdoer from further and more widespread acts of disclosure.
25
26Kardashian was one of Simpson’s lawyers during Simpson’s criminal trial. Schiller, a friend of
27Kardashian, called Kardashian immediately upon learning of the murders, and began encouraging
28Kardashian to surreptitiously take notes and tape record events. Gross Dec. ¶¶ 9(c), 10(c), 14(d), 17(a)
1
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1& Exs. E, F, J, M. Near the end of the trial, Schiller encouraged Kardashian to represent he was co-
2authoring an
3Simpson Dec. ¶¶
4At the close of Simpson’s trial, Simpson reminded his attorneys that, due to their fiduciary
5obligations, they could not disclose privileged communications or confidential client information,
6without written authorization. Simpson Dec. ¶¶ 5, 19 & Exs. A, F; Dershowitz Dec. ¶¶
7Dec. ¶¶
8Thompson Dec. ¶¶
9Kardashian and Schiller each spoke to Simpson, and stated that they wanted to
10book from Kardashian’s point of view. They each agreed that they would not include privileged and
11confidential client information in any manuscript unless Simpson gave approval, and would submit any
12manuscript to Simpson prior to publication for review and deletion of such material. Both sent letters
13to Simpson that confirmed they were collaborating on a book. Simpson Dec. ¶¶ 7,
14
15utilized Kardashian to gain access to defense team members. Gross Dec. ¶ 14(e) & Ex. J.
16Schiller insinuated himself into a position of trust and confidence with Simpson, by assisting the
17criminal defense team on a number of matters, such as obtaining clean audio copies of tape recordings
18of interviews with key witness Mark Fuhrman; assisting Simpson during the trial in writing a book, I
19Want to Tell You; convincing Simpson that Schiller should
20of the trial; signing an agreement concerning this book that he would keep confidential all interviews
21arranged by Simpson, and giving Simpson the right to change or delete any material in the final
22manuscript; and after Simpson’s acquittal, assisting Simpson in producing a video about the case and
23assisted in raising funds. Simpson Dec. ¶¶
24that he took these actions for exploitation, to manipulate and ingratiate himself with Simpson and the
25defense team and to gain access, “keeping his eye on the prize.” Gross Dec. ¶¶ 10(b), 11(b), 12, 17(b)-
26(d), 19 & Exs.
27In November 1995, Kardashian informed Simpson that his publisher, Random House, to
28approve Kardashian’s book deal, needed a letter from Simpson, and sent a draft letter that would have
2
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1granted an explicit waiver by Simpson of his privilege as to any communications between Simpson and
2Kardashian. Simpson refused to sign, as he was not willing to waive his privileges. Kardashian
3negotiated with Simpson’s attorneys and finally obtained a letter that did not authorize any waiver that
4he said would be acceptable to his publisher. Thereafter, Kardashian made repeated representations
5that he was writing a book with Schiller and would submit any manuscript for review, and never, until
6the impending publication of the book, stated anything otherwise. Simpson Dec. ¶¶
7Exs.
8In late 1995 and early 1996, Schiller spoke to Simpson, stating that some lawyerson the defense
9team would not speak to him, and requesting that Simpson give these lawyers permission to speak to
10Schiller. Schiller explicitly represented and agreed that the interviews were for Kardashian’s book, that
11everything the other attorneys would say to him would be protected and not disclosed due to
12Kardashian’s responsibilities as Simpson’s lawyer, that no privileged or confidentialinformation would
13be published unless Simpson gave explicit approval, and that prior to dissemination he and Kardashian
14would submit any manuscript to Simpson for his review. In light of these representations, Simpson
15agreed to give members of his defense team permission to speak to Schiller, and thereafter complied
16with his obligations. Simpson never gave any attorney permission to disclose confidential or privileged
17information to Schiller. Simpson Dec. ¶¶
18Schiller admits that he interviewed eight attorneys on Simpson’s defense team, other than
19Kardashian. Gross Dec. ¶ 13(c) & Ex. I. All eight attorneys state that Schiller made agreements with
20them, in exchange for their agreeing to be interviewed, that the interviews were for a book he was co-
21authoring with Kardashian, and that he would submit any manuscript to Simpson for review and
22removal of any privileged or confidential information. Kardashian made similar representations. If
23Kardashian had not been a
24representations, these attorneys would not have agreed to be interviewed. Dershowitz Dec. ¶¶
25Scheck Dec. ¶¶
26Dec. ¶¶
27In August 1996, when Simpson’s attorney learned that Kardashian’s book was nearing
28completion, he contacted both Kardashian and Schiller to obtain a copy. Both Schiller and Kardashian
3
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
confirmed to him and Simpson that the manuscript would be submitted to Simpson, and Schiller made arrangements with Simpson’s lawyers to review the manuscript. Neufeld Dec. ¶¶
In October 1996, Schiller published a book entitled American Tragedy: The Uncensored Story of the Simpson Defense (the “Book”). Schiller is listed as an author; Kardashian is not. Neither Schiller nor Kardashian submitted a draft of the manuscript of the Book to Simpson for review prior to publication. Neufeld Dec. ¶¶
The Book contains a substantial amount of information that Schiller admits is privileged and confidential client information, available only to members of Simpson’s defense team. Gross Dec. ¶¶ 9(b), 10(a), 11(a), 13(b) & Exs.
.written from deep within the Simpson defense . . . recounted in authentic, often startling detail in the words of Simpson’s confidants, lawyers, special investigators, and expert witnesses . . . in the uncensored words of Simpson’s closest confidants and attorneys.” Schiller concedes, both in the Book and in subsequent interviews, that Kardashian was the source of a large portion of the purported privileged and confidential client information contained in the Book. Neufeld Dec. ¶¶
1/ |
Whenthe Book was published, Simpson was involved in a civil trial brought by members of the Goldman |
|
and Brown families, and due to the financial and time pressures from that trial, was unable to bring a lawsuit to seek an injunction preventing the publication of the Book. Simpson Dec. ¶ 36.
4
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1The StateBar ofCalifornia determined that Kardashiancommitted professionalmisconduct and
2violated Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068(e), suspending him for two years, based upon a stipulation by
3Kardashian. Neufeld Dec. ¶ 26 & Ex. H.
4In
5a miniseries concerning Simpson’s trial, based on the information that Schiller had obtained while
6writing a book with Kardashian, and that Schiller was producing and directing. Simpson diligently
7acted to retain counsel in this matter and to bring this lawsuit. Simpson Dec. ¶¶ 37, 39.
8The screenplay for the Miniseries contains a substantial amount of information that purports to
9be privileged and confidential client information, i.e., conversations involving only counsel and
10Simpson, conversations involving only defense team members, and comments by counsel on defense
11strategy (approximately 152 pages out of a total of 193 pages). In addition, the Miniseries includes a
12large amount of such information that was not published in the Book (approximately 47 pages out of
13a total of 193 pages). Gross Dec. ¶¶
14counsel sent letters to Schiller demanding that he cease and desist from any involvement with the
15Miniseries and requesting a copy of the screenplay for
16counsel responded that Schiller would not do so. Gross Dec. ¶¶
17published to a limited audience; in contrast, the Miniseries is to be broadcast nationally by CBS
18Television in November, and will be seen by millions of viewers. Gross Dec. ¶¶
19 |
ARGUMENT |
20I. A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD ISSUE
21In determining whether to issue a preliminaryinjunction, a court must weigh two “interrelated”
22factors: (1) the likelihood that the plaintiff will succeed on the merits at trial; and (2) the relative interim
23harm that the plaintiff will likely suffer if an injunction is not issued compared to the likely interim harm
24to defendant if an injunction is issued. Butt v. State, 4 Cal. 4th 668,
25plaintiff’s showing on one, the less must be shown on the other to support an injunction.” Id. at 678.
26Here, injunctive relief enjoining the dissemination of the Miniseries is essential, because once
27disseminated it will be impossible to undo the disclosures. See Point III, infra.
28
5
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
II.SIMPSON HAS SHOWN A LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS.
A.The Miniseries Consists Predominantly of Presumptively Privileged and Confidential
It cannot be disputed that the screenplay for the Miniseries is predominantly comprised of scenes that are purported to be conversations between Simpson and his attorneys, discussions between and among attorneys representing Simpson, and Simpson’s attorneys commenting in present time on defense strategy; in fact, these scenes are found on approximately 152 pages out of a total 193 pages in the screenplay. All of these scenes thus involve privileged and confidential client information. See, e.g., Cal. Evid. Code §§ 952, 954; City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court, 37 Cal. 2d 227,
§6068(e); Evid. Code § 917; De Los Santos v. Superior Court, 27 Cal. 3d 677, 682 (1980). This type of information would lose its privileged and confidential nature only if defendants had properly and lawfully obtained the information. However, as demonstrated below, Simpson is likely to succeed in establishing that defendants obtained this information improperly and unlawfully by breaching confidentiality agreements and fiduciary duties.
B.Simpson Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of His Claim for Conspiracy to Breach Kardashian’s Fiduciary Duties.
The evidence submitted demonstrates that, from the beginning of Kardashian’s representation, Schiller and he conspired to breach fiduciaryduties. The fiduciaryattorney and client relationship is “of
2/ |
Schiller contends that the information in the Book and Miniseries is accurate and factual, Gross Dec. |
|
¶18 & Ex. N, including the information which is purported to be of privileged and confidential communications. Thus, plaintiff need not demonstrate, or even claim, that the information contained in the Miniseries disclosed by his attorney is true and accurate, since an attorney violates his duty of loyalty simply by commenting on information concerning the
6
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1the very highest character.” Lee v. State Bar, 2 Cal.3d 927, 939 (1970). “One of the principal
2obligations which bind an attorney is that of fidelity, the maintaining inviolate the confidence reposed
3in him . . . and at every peril to himself to preserve the secrets of his client.” Flatt v. Superior Court,
49 Cal. 4th 275, 289 (1994). See also Barber v. Municipal Court, 24 Cal. 3d 742,
5fundamental right to counsel “embodies the right to communicate in absolute privacy with one’s
6attorney”); In re Jordan, 7 Cal. 3d 930,
7a rule of mere professional conduct, but instead involves public policies of paramount importance”);
8Alkow v. State Bar, 3 Cal. 3d 924, 936 (1971). As the Supreme Court recently reemphasized:
9Attorneys have a duty to maintain undivided loyaltyto their clients to avoid undermining public
confidence in the legal profession and the judicial process. The effective functioning of the
10fiduciary relationship between attorney and client depends on the client’s trust and confidence in counsel. The courts will protect clients’ legitimate expectations of loyalty to preserve this
11essential basis for trust and security in the
12People ex rel. Dept. of Corp. v. SpeeDee Oil Change Sys., Inc., 20 Cal. 4th 1135,
13Under California law, an attorneyhas an express statutoryduty, broader than the
14privilege, “[t]o maintain inviolate the confidence, and at every peril to himself or herself to preserve the
15secrets, of his or her client.” Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068(e); Goldstein v. Lees, 46 Cal. App. 3d 614, 621
16& n.5 (1975). “The attorney’s lips are forever sealed” as to information gained during the attorney-
17client relationship. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. Palermo, 121 Cal.App.2d 616, 625 (1953).
18Here, there is substantial evidence that Kardashian breached his fiduciary duties to Simpson.
19The State Bar of California recently determined that Kardashian violated Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068(e).
20Kardashian is the primary source of the information in the Book and Miniseries concerning attorney-
21client conversations and defense team discussions. Kardashian induced other Simpson attorneys to
22provide information to Schiller by representing that he was the
23manuscript would be submitted to Simpson’s attorney for review. Kardashian received compensation
24for his participation in the Book and promoted the Book. See Statement of Facts.
25Schiller and Project 95 are jointly liable for Kardashian’s breaches. A person who “intentionally
26causes or assists an agent to violate a duty to his principal is subject to liability to the principal.”
27Restatement (Second) of Agency § 312 (1958). Numerous California cases have applied this principle.
28
7
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
1offiduciaryduties liable for their participation); Pierce v. Lyman, 1 Cal. App. 4th 1093,
2Certified Grocers of Calif., Ltd. v. San Gabriel Valley Bank, 150 Cal. App. 3d 281, 289 (1983);
3Morales v. Field, DeGoff, Huppert & MacGowan, 99 Cal. App. 3d 307,
4Armenian Church of Los Angeles v. Kurkjian, 47 Cal. App. 3d 547, 552 (1975); Gray v. Sutherland,
5124 Cal. App. 2d 280, 290 (1954); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 312, comment c (1958) (“A
6person who, with notice that an agent is thereby violating his dutyto his principal, receives confidential
7information from the agent, may be enjoined from disclosing it”).
8The evidence is equally clear that Schiller induced, participated in, and reaped the benefit of
9Kardashian’s breach offiduciaryduties. Schiller encouraged Kardashian from the start of Kardashian’s
10 |
representation to surreptitiously take notes and tape record events for use in a book, encouraged |
||
11 |
Kardashian to represent that he was writing a book with Schiller, induced Kardashian to disclose |
||
12 |
privileged and confidential client information to him, and represented to Simpson and Simpson’s |
||
13 |
attorneys that the interviews he was conducting were for a book with Kardashian and that due to |
||
14 |
Kardashian’s fiduciary duties no privileged or confidential could be contained in any publication. The |
||
15 |
Book, and the Miniseries, are based primarily on informationimproperly obtained fromKardashian. See |
||
16 |
Statement of Facts. |
||
17 |
|
C. |
Simpson Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of His Claims for Breaches |
|
|
|
of Schiller’s Contracts With Him and With His Attorneys |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Schiller entered into an oral agreement with Simpson, by promising to submit any manuscript |
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
from his interviews of Simpson’s defense team members to Simpson for |
||
20 |
|
|
|
|
removal of any privileged or confidential information, in return for Simpson providing access to |
||
21 |
|
|
|
|
members of the defense team. Schiller breached this agreement, by refusing to submit the manuscript |
||
22 |
|
|
|
|
of the Book or the manuscript for the Miniseries to Simpson for |
||
23 |
|
|
|
|
of Facts at |
||
24 |
|
|
|
|
to the contrary of all eight prominent members of the bar who Schiller interviewed. |
||
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Simpson is equally likely to prevail on claim as third party beneficiary for breach of Schiller’s |
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
contracts with members of defense team. See generally Civ. Code § 1559 (“[a] contract, made |
||
27 |
|
|
|
|
expressly for the benefit of a third person, may be enforced by him”); 1 Witkin, Summary of Calif. Law |
||
28 |
(Contracts) § 656, at 595 (9th ed. 1987). Schiller breached oral agreements with all eight of Simpson’s |
||
|
|||
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION |
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
lawyers he interviewed that he would submit any manuscript concerning the interviews to Simpson for prepublication review and removal of any privileged and confidential information. See Statement of Facts at 3. These agreements clearly were for the benefit of Simpson as a third party beneficiary.
D.Simpson Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of His Claim for Fraud.
As discussed above, the evidence demonstrates that: Schiller and Kardashian made numerous fraudulent representations to Simpson and members of his defense team that they were
E.Simpson Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of
His Claim for Breach of Schiller’s Fiduciary Duties.
Schiller also owed a separate fiduciary duty directly to Simpson by reason of their special relationship, which he also breached. “One who voluntarily assumes a position of trust and confidence is a fiduciary, and he remains a fiduciary as long as trust and confidence are reposed in him.” Sime v. Malouf, 95 Cal. App. 2d 82, 98 (1949); see also
3/ |
Simpson’s cause of action for fraud, with a |
|
barred, since the fraudulent conspiracy continues until the present. An action for civil conspiracy only accrues when the last overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy occurs. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co., 24 Cal. 3d 773,
9
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Form Data
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Form Usage | The Points and Authorities form is employed to support a legal argument or application, such as a request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a preliminary injunction. |
| Legal Principle Emphasized | It underscores the principle of attorney-client privilege, stressing that communications between a client and their lawyer are protected and confidential. |
| Breach of Confidentiality and Fiduciary Duty | Robert Kardashian and Lawrence Schiller are accused of betraying O.J. Simpson by disclosing confidential information and breaching their fiduciary duties for personal gain. |
| Case Specifics | The form is part of a case in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, involving Simpson as the plaintiff. |
| Objective of the Legal Action | The goal is to prevent further unauthorized disclosure of privileged information by enjoining the defendants from participating in or transferring rights associated with a miniseries. |
| Governing Law | The action is grounded in principles of American law that enforce confidentiality agreements and protect privileged communications, highlighting that there is no First Amendment defense to breach of confidentiality obligations. |
Instructions on Utilizing Points And Authorities
Filling out the Points And Authorities form is a critical step in legal proceedings when seeking judicial interventions such as temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions. It involves presenting a detailed argument to support the request, grounded in legal principles and supported by the factual context of the case. This process necessitates a meticulous approach to ensure the document accurately reflects the legal and factual foundations of the application. The following steps are designed to guide through the process of completing the form, emphasizing the structured presentation of arguments and evidence.
- Start by entering the names of the attorneys for the plaintiff at the top left of the form. In this case, input "Terry Gross (103878) Adam C. Belsky (147800)" as the attorneys and "GROSS & BELSKY LLP" as their law firm.
- Below the attorneys' information, list the law firm's address: "One Maritime Plaza, Suite 1040, San Francisco, California 94111" and their telephone number "(415) 544-0200".
- Identify the party the attorneys represent under "Attorneys for Plaintiff" by writing "ORENTHAL JAMES SIMPSON".
- In the section titled "SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES", proceed to fill in the case number in the provided space once it is assigned.
- Under the case number, state the nature of the document as "MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION".
- List the defendants in the case as "LAWRENCE SCHILLER, ROBERT KARDASHIAN, PROJECT 95 PRODUCTIONS, INC., and DOES 1-40".
- Indicate the date and time of the hearing as "August 15, 2000" and "8:30 a.m.", respectively, followed by "Dept.: 85/86" to specify the department where the case will be heard.
- In the "STATEMENT OF FACTS" section, begin with a strong introduction that sets the stage for the argument, emphasizing the confidentiality and loyalty obligations of attorneys to their clients, and the alleged breaches of these duties in the present case.
- Proceed to detail the factual background supporting the request for the injunction, systematically addressing how Robert Kardashian and Lawrence Schiller allegedly violated their ethical duties by conspiring to exploit confidential information for personal gain.
- Explicitly outline the legal principles that underpin the request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction, including the importance of preserving client-attorney privileges and enforcing confidentiality agreements.
- Conclude by summarizing the necessity of the requested judicial relief to prevent further unauthorized disclosures and the inadequacy of other remedies in fully addressing the harm caused by such breaches.
After completing these steps, the document should present a coherent and compelling argument that justifies the granting of the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The next phase involves filing the form with the court, serving it upon the defendants, and preparing for the hearing. At the hearing, the arguments laid out in the Points and Authorities will be presented orally, emphasizing the need for immediate court intervention to protect the plaintiff's rights and interests.
Obtain Answers on Points And Authorities
What is a Points and Authorities form?
A Points and Authorities form is a legal document submitted to a court to support a particular motion, such as an application for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or a Preliminary Injunction. It outlines the legal and factual basis for the request, including relevant laws, statutes, and case precedents. The document serves to persuade the court that based on the law and the facts, the relief requested should be granted.
When is a Points and Authorities form used?
This form is used in various legal proceedings when a party is seeking a specific court order or ruling. Common instances include requests for temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, dismissals, summary judgments, and other pre-trial motions. It's essential whenever a party needs to support their motion with legal arguments and evidence.
How do you write a Points and Authorities form?
Writing a Points and Authorities form involves several steps: identifying the legal issues at hand, researching relevant laws and case law that support your position, and presenting the facts of your case in a clear, concise manner. Begin with a brief introduction of the case and the relief you are seeking. Then, for each point or legal issue, state the relevant law and how it applies to the facts of your case. Finally, conclude by summarizing your arguments and reiterating the relief requested.
Can anyone submit a Points and Authorities form?
Yes, either a lawyer representing a party in a case or a party representing themselves (a "pro se" litigant) can submit a Points and Authorities form. However, it's crucial to research and understand the legal standards involved thoroughly. The document must be well-organized, correctly formatted according to court rules, and persuasive to be effective.
What are the common mistakes to avoid when drafting a Points and Authorities form?
- Being unclear or vague about the laws and facts;
- Failing to tailor the arguments to the specific facts of the case;
- Omitting relevant legal precedents or misinterpreting the law;
- Not following the proper format or court rules;
- Forgetting to proofread for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Where can I find examples or templates for a Points and Authorities form?
Examples and templates for Points and Authorities forms can be found in legal libraries, online legal resources, and sometimes on court websites under their self-help or forms sections. Legal research websites like Westlaw or LexisNexis offer extensive databases of legal documents, though they may require a subscription. Local law libraries and some law firms may also provide samples or guidance on drafting your document.
Common mistakes
When filling out the Points and Authorities form, there are common mistakes that people often make. These mistakes can significantly impact the effectiveness and clarity of the document. It's important to avoid these errors to ensure that your Points and Authorities form effectively supports your legal arguments. Listed below are eight mistakes to steer clear of:
- Not verifying the case information: Every detail, including case numbers, party names, and court jurisdiction, must be accurate and match the records.
- Skipping relevant legal standards: It's crucial to cite the correct legal standards and precedents that apply to your case. Missing or incorrect standards can weaken your argument.
- Failing to present facts clearly: The facts should be presented logically and coherently. Chronological presentation helps in understanding the sequence of events.
- Overlooking the importance of confidentiality: Not respecting the confidentiality of sensitive information can lead to legal implications and weaken client trust.
- Incorrect citation of authorities: Legal arguments rely heavily on precedents. Therefore, it's important to cite all legal authorities accurately.
- Not tailoring the argument to the client's specific situation: Each argument should be directly relevant to the client's case, avoiding generic or broad statements that don't support specific claims.
- Ignoring opposing arguments: Acknowledging and refuting opposing arguments can strengthen your case, as it shows that you've considered all aspects.
- Grammar and spelling errors: These can detract from the professionalism of the document and potentially confuse the intended meaning of your arguments.
To ensure that your Points and Authorities form is as compelling and effective as possible, carefully review each section for these common mistakes. A well-prepared document not only supports your legal arguments but also reflects your attention to detail and commitment to your client's case.
Documents used along the form
When handling legal matters, especially in court, a variety of forms and documents are crucial to support a case effectively. The Points and Authorities form is commonly used to summarize the legal basis for a motion or other court application. Similarly, there are several other essential documents and forms used in conjunction with the Points and Authorities to ensure a comprehensive and persuasive presentation of a case. Here are six key forms and documents:
- Declaration or Affidavit: A written statement made under oath by a party or witness. It provides evidence and factual statements to support motions or claims.
- Notice of Motion: A document filed and served by the party making a motion, which informs the other party and the court about the motion and when it will be heard.
- Memorandum of Law: Similar to Points and Authorities, this document lays out the legal arguments and relevant case laws or statutes that support the motion or application.
- Proposed Order: A draft of the order that the filer wishes the court to adopt. It details the specific relief or action requested from the court.
- Proof of Service: A declaration or affidavit attesting that the documents were properly served on the other parties involved in the case, detailing how, when, and where the documents were served.
- Case Management Statement: Filed by the parties in a lawsuit, this document outlines the status of a case and helps the court manage its docket and plan for the case.
Each document plays a specific role in the litigation process, helping to clarify the facts, legal positions, and procedural steps for the court and all parties involved. Together, these documents form the backbone of effective legal communication and are indispensable for a well-organized legal presentation in court.
Similar forms
Legal Briefs - Similar to the Points and Authorities form, legal briefs present arguments and legal theories to the court, supported by statutory, case law, and secondary sources. Both documents focus on persuading the court regarding particular legal points, utilizing facts and legal precedents as foundational elements for their arguments.
Amicus Curiae Briefs - Amicus Curiae briefs are documents filed in appellate court cases by non-litigants with a strong interest in the subject matter. The purpose is to inform the court of relevant, additional information or arguments that the court might wish to consider. Like the Points and Authorities form, these briefs rely heavily on legal research and precedent to support their positions, albeit from the perspective of interested outsiders.
Motion for Summary Judgment - This legal document requests the court to rule that the other party has no case, because there are no facts at issue. Like the Points and Authorities document, it includes statements of law and refers to evidence proving why the moving party is entitled to judgment. Both entail a detailed presentation of facts interwoven with statutory and case law.
Complaints - Filed to initiate lawsuits, complaints outline the basis of jurisdiction, legal claims, and the relief sought. Although serving a different purpose from the Points and Authorities form, which supports specific legal motions, both documents set forth the legal framework and facts intended to persuade the court of the merits of the case or motion.
Answers to Complaints - These are defensive legal documents responding to the allegations in a complaint. While an Answer typically denies allegations or sets forth defenses, it can resemble a Points and Authorities form in structure and purpose when it elaborates on legal arguments for those defenses, using legal authorities and evidence to support its position.
Legal Memorandums - Often used within law firms or between attorneys, these documents offer in-depth analyses of legal issues, similar to the discussions found in Points and Authorities. Both types of documents rely on legal precedent, statues, and analytical reasoning to argue for specific interpretations or applications of the law.
Appeal Briefs - Submitted in appellate court proceedings, these briefs argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld or overturned. Like Points and Authorities, Appeal Briefs meticulously cite legal precedent and statutes to support their arguments, serving a persuasive role rooted in established law and facts from the trial record.
Dos and Don'ts
Filling out a Points and Authorities form is an essential step in presenting a case to a court. It outlines the legal basis and evidence to support a claim or defense. Paying close attention to detail and understanding the do's and don'ts can greatly impact the effectiveness of your submission. Below are key things you should and shouldn't do:
- Do ensure that all the information is accurate and factual. Misrepresenting facts or law can undermine your credibility and negatively affect your case.
- Do carefully cite the correct statutes, case law, or other legal authorities that support your position. This demonstrates that your argument is grounded in established law.
- Do present your arguments clearly and concisely. Long-winded or convoluted explanations can confuse the reader and dilute the strength of your position.
- Do organize your Points and Authorities in a logical order, starting with the most relevant and persuasive arguments.
- Don't forget to proofread your document for spelling and grammatical errors. Such mistakes can detract from the professionalism of your submission.
- Don't ignore formatting requirements set forth by the court. Proper formatting aids in the readability and overall presentation of your document.
- Don't rely solely on broad legal principles without applying them to the specific facts of your case. Contextualizing your arguments makes them more compelling.
- Don't include irrelevant or unnecessary information. Stick to the facts and arguments that directly support your legal position.
By adhering to these guidelines, you can create a more persuasive and effective Points and Authorities document. It's about not just what you say, but how you say it. A well-structured and meticulously prepared form can significantly influence the outcome of your legal matter.
Misconceptions
When it comes to legal documents, especially forms like the Points and Authorities, misconceptions can muddy the waters for individuals trying to navigate the legal system. Let's address and clarify some of these common misunderstandings.
- It's only for criminal cases: A widespread belief is that Points and Authorities forms are exclusive to criminal proceedings. However, this form is utilized in various legal matters, including civil litigation, to support motions and applications. It plays a critical role in presenting legal arguments and relevant case law to back a party's claims or defenses.
- It's a simple form you can complete quickly: While the form serves as a template, the preparation involves a comprehensive understanding of the case's facts, relevant laws, and the ability to argue how those laws apply to your case. Crafting a compelling Points and Authorities document requires thorough research and legal analysis, far beyond merely filling out a form.
- Any lawyer or individual can prepare it with ease: Not all attorneys may have the specialized knowledge needed for certain cases, and individuals representing themselves might find the process particularly daunting. Crafting effective Points and Authorities demands not only an understanding of the law but also skills in legal writing and argumentation.
- No need for citations or references: Contrary to this belief, Points and Authorities must be meticulously supported with citations from statutes, case law, and other authoritative sources. The strength of this document lies in its ability to convincingly reference legal precedents and statutes that support the argument being made.
- Once submitted, it cannot be challenged or revised: In practice, the initial submission of the Points and Authorities is not final. Revisions can occur, especially in response to challenges from the opposing party or feedback from the court. This iterative process is crucial for refining arguments and strengthening the case.
Understanding these aspects of Points and Authorities helps demystify the document, highlighting its importance in legal proceedings and the effort required to prepare it effectively.
Key takeaways
Understanding the use of Points and Authorities forms is critical for legal practitioners and individuals engaged in legal disputes. Here are key takeaways to guide you through the process of filling out and using this form:
- Clearly identify the parties involved: It's important to accurately designate the plaintiff and the defendant along with their respective legal representatives to ensure that the document is properly addressed within the legal framework.
- Articulate the basis of the jurisdiction: Clarify the legal ground and the jurisdiction under which the claim is being filed, which in turn, helps in directing the submission to the appropriate legal body for adjudication.
- State your case succinctly: When drafting a memorandum of points and authorities, present your arguments coherently and support them with relevant legal statutes and precedents to establish a strong foundation for your case.
- Include factual background: Providing a detailed statement of facts is essential. This offers context and supports the legal arguments being made, illustrating how they apply to the specifics of your case.
- Understand the privilege of confidential communication: The principle that communications between attorneys and their clients are protected is fundamental. Recognizing and articulating this within your document is crucial, especially in cases where confidentiality and attorney-client privilege are at stake.
- Highlight any breach of confidentiality or fiduciary duties: If the case involves the unauthorized disclosure of privileged information or a breach of fiduciary duty, it is important to detail these aspects clearly, as they can significantly impact the outcome.
- Request specific relief: Be explicit about the type of legal remedy you are seeking, such as a temporary restraining order (TRO) or a preliminary injunction. This guides the court in understanding the immediate protection or action you are requesting.
- Emphasize the irreversibility of information dissemination: In cases seeking to prevent the disclosure of confidential information, stress the importance of timely judicial intervention to preempt irreparable harm caused by such disclosures.
- Provide evidence of prior agreements and communications: Documentation of agreements, especially those regarding the non-disclosure of confidential information, is vital. This includes any written contracts or correspondence that can substantiate claims of breach or misconduct.
Mastering the composition and strategic use of the Points and Authorities form can play a pivotal role in legal proceedings. It serves not just as a tool for presenting arguments but as a foundation for building a persuasive legal case, thereby emphasizing the necessity for meticulous preparation and a thorough understanding of the applicable law.
Popular PDF Forms
Big Foot Coffee - Dive into your next career adventure with BigFoot Java. Our easy-to-complete application form awaits your submission.
How to Notify Medicaid of Income Change - Explore adding new family members to your Medi-Cal coverage, including the documentation needed for newborns or other dependents.
Key Distribution Form - A form delineating the responsibilities associated with key usage at the College of Design, including the handling of lost or stolen keys.